Based on
definition: Phomemes are contrastive.
When you have two or more
sounds, found in identical
environments, (transcribed identically except for
one sound) that
mean different things.
Example:
[bij] ‘bee’ [phij] ‘pea’/‘pee’
The sounds [b]
and [ph] contrast in minimal pairs
and thus belong
to separate phonemes.
[suw] ‘sue’
[zuw] ‘zoo’
The sounds [s]
and [z] contrast in minimal pairs and thus belong to separate phonemes.
Data Pattern #2 –
Complementary Distribution, cont.
Some
General Enviornments
& Notations:
1. Word boundaries
¡word
initial #_____
¡word
final ______#
2. Before certain sounds;
before sound classes
¡___i, ____s, ____ N, ___ palatals, ___C, ___V
3. After certain sounds;
after sound classes
¡i ___, s ____, N ____, palatals
___, C___, V___
4. Between certain
sounds; sound classes
¡i____i, s____s, N___N, pal.___pal., C__C, V__V
Data Pattern #2 –
Complementary Distribution, cont.
Example: Spanish
[dexo] ‘finger’
[donde] ‘where’
[naxa] ‘nothing’
[pixe] ‘3p
sing. asks’
[pwexe] ‘3p
sing. can’
[pared]
‘wall’
[r]= flap (symbol won’t show)
Also, [d] = dental
Note that
phones are phonetically similar
¡Both
dental (dental vs. interdental)
¡Both
voiced
[d] occurs in: elsewhere
#___e
#___o
n___e
e___#
[x] e___o V___V
a___a
i___e
e__e
The phones [d] and [x] are found in
complementary distribution and
thus belong to
the same phoneme. [d] and [x] are
allophones of the same phoneme /d/.
/d/
[x] V_V
[d]
elsewhere
Data Pattern #3 –
Analogous Environments
Based on
definition: Phomemes are contrastive.
This pattern is when you find two
sounds in
nearly the same environments, but do not have
data for a minimal
pair. The appearance of these
two sounds
does not seem to be conditioned by
any specific phonetic environments, because
they both occur in analogous environments.
Data Pattern #3 –
Analagous Environments, cont.
Analagous Environments, cont.
lExample:
#___a #____a
i___a i_____a
i_____a
These phones are found in analogous
environments and thus
belong
to different phonemes. These sounds are
allophones of different
phonemes.
Data Pattern #4 –
Free Variation
Free Variation
Based on
definition: Phomemes are realized by allophones
This pattern is when you find two
sounds in the same environments, and there does not seem to be a change in
meaning. In other
words, it appears that the phones can interchange with one another with no
effect in meaning. This is usually a result of phonetic
distinction that you perceive that is not contrastive in this language.
Data Pattern #4 –
Free Variation, cont.
Free Variation, cont.
Example: English
Both
of these phones are found in identical
environments, and yet, unlike the
analogous
environments examples, alternation of these
phones does NOT create
differences in meaning.
Thus, both the [p] and the [p] (unreleased)
are allophones
of, and thus belong to, the
same phoneme.
To summarize…
To show you have
allophones of the same phoneme:
1.Complementary
Distribution
¡phones occur in unique, separate,
individual
environments
¡environment of sounds conditions
allophone
2.Free Variation
¡Phones occur in the exact same
environments or near-identical
environments but don’t change
meaning
¡Seem to be used interchangeably, or
substitute for one another,
are realized as allophones.
Phonemes
To show you have
allophones of different phonemes:
1.Minimal Pairs –
¡sounds occur in exactly the same
environments
– in an IDENTICAL set
- AND changes meaning of words
¡
2.Analogous Environments
¡Phones occur in overlapping
environments, and in near-identical
environments, but word meanings are
different
●
Phonemes
are contrastive.